Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care ; 8(8): 745-754, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27357206

RESUMO

Regulatory authorities interpret the results of randomized controlled trials according to published principles. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is planning a revision of the 2000 and 2003 guidance documents on clinical investigation of new medicinal products for the treatment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) to achieve consistency with current knowledge in the field. This manuscript summarizes the key output from a collaborative workshop, organized by the Cardiovascular Round Table and the European Affairs Committee of the European Society of Cardiology, involving clinicians, academic researchers, trialists, European and US regulators, and pharmaceutical industry researchers. Specific questions in four key areas were selected as priorities for changes in regulatory guidance: patient selection, endpoints, methodologic issues and issues related to the research for novel agents. Patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-STEMI (NSTEMI) should be studied separately for therapies aimed at the specific pathophysiology of either condition, particularly for treatment of the acute phase, but can be studied together for other treatments, especially long-term therapy. Unstable angina patients should be excluded from acute phase ACS trials. In general, cardiovascular death and reinfarction are recommended for primary efficacy endpoints; other endpoints may be considered if specifically relevant for the therapy under study. New agents or interventions should be tested against a background of evidence-based therapy with expanded follow-up for safety assessment. In conclusion, new guidance documents for randomized controlled trials in ACS should consider changes regarding patient and endpoint selection and definitions, and trial designs. Specific requirements for the evaluation of novel pharmacological therapies need further clarification.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Cardiologia/organização & administração , Educação/métodos , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Infarto do Miocárdio com Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/fisiopatologia , Angina Instável/terapia , Morte , Determinação de Ponto Final/métodos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Intervenção Coronária Percutânea/métodos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Reperfusão/métodos , Medição de Risco , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos
2.
Circulation ; 105(20): 2341-6, 2002 May 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12021218

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic decisions regarding pharmacological therapy should be based on safety and tolerability as well as efficacy data. Clinical trials designed to assess efficacy are often insufficiently powered to generate reliable safety data. METHODS AND RESULTS: The West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study (WOSCOPS), the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE), and Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) studies collectively accumulated >112 000 person-years of exposure in double-blind randomized trials comparing placebo and pravastatin (40 mg once daily). During 5 years of exposure, the incidence of fatal and nonfatal cancers was similar between pravastatin and placebo groups. No differences in noncardiovascular serious adverse events were detected. With >243 000 blood sample analyses, the percentage of patients with any abnormal liver function test after baseline sampling was similar (>3x the upper limit of normal for alanine aminotransferase: 128 [1.4%] versus 131 [1.4%] patients for pravastatin versus placebo, respectively). Study medication was withdrawn in 3 pravastatin and 7 placebo patients due to creatine phosphokinase elevations; no cases of mild or severe myopathy were reported. A Cox regression model considering treatment group, age, diabetes, smoking, whether primary or secondary prevention study, and cardiovascular serious adverse events indicates that the likelihood of discontinuing pravastatin was less than placebo. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective analysis indicates that during prolonged exposure, 40 mg of pravastatin is well tolerated, with no excess of noncardiovascular serious adverse events, including liver function abnormalities and laboratory and clinical evidence for myositis. These extensive safety and tolerability data provide important information for therapeutic decisions regarding this pharmacological agent.


Assuntos
Anticolesterolemiantes/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/efeitos adversos , Pravastatina/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Demografia , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Gastroenteropatias/epidemiologia , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Hipercolesterolemia/tratamento farmacológico , Incidência , Hepatopatias/enzimologia , Hepatopatias/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Doenças Musculares/epidemiologia , Pravastatina/uso terapêutico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Insuficiência Renal/epidemiologia , Risco , Medição de Risco , Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...